1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2005 Scion xA
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Scion xA. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2005 Scion xA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 256 kg more than 2005 Scion xA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xA. (142 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xA.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2005 Scion xA | |
| Make | Nissan | Scion |
| Model | Cedric | xA |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |
