1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Cedric | UTE |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
