1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Opel Vivaro
To start off, 2009 Opel Vivaro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Opel Vivaro. (101 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2009 Opel Vivaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Opel Vivaro weights approximately 288 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Opel Vivaro (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Opel Vivaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Opel Vivaro | |
Make | Nissan | Opel |
Model | Cedric | Vivaro |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3100 mm |