1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Alpina B5
To start off, 2010 Alpina B5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Alpina B5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alpina B5 (493 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 384 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alpina B5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Alpina B5 weights approximately 394 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Alpina B5 (700 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 503 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Alpina B5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Alpina B5 | |
Make | Nissan | Alpina |
Model | Cedric | B5 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2890 mm |