1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Cedric | Escalade |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2612 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3302 mm |