1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 883 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (360 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cedric | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2173 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5207 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1991 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3020 mm |
