1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Cedric | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2875 mm |