1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Cedric | Epica |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
