1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Ford Crown Victoria
To start off, 2012 Ford Crown Victoria is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Crown Victoria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Crown Victoria (224 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Crown Victoria should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Crown Victoria weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Crown Victoria (359 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Crown Victoria will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Ford Crown Victoria | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cedric | Crown Victoria |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2920 mm |