1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2012 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Tribeca weights approximately 579 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Tribeca (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2012 Subaru Tribeca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Subaru Tribeca | |
| Make | Nissan | Subaru |
| Model | Cedric | Tribeca |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1869 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1687 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2748 mm |
