1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Audi A5
To start off, 2013 Audi A5 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A5 (208 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A5 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A5 (350 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Nissan | Audi |
| Model | Cedric | A5 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 208 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4626 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2751 mm |
