1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. Both 1968 Nissan Cedric and 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 245 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Nissan | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cedric | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |
