1968 Nissan Skyline vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Skyline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Skyline would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Skyline. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Skyline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 490 kg more than 1968 Nissan Skyline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Nissan Skyline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Nissan Skyline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Skyline | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | Skyline | CL |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2715 mm |