1968 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2004 Scion xB
To start off, 2004 Scion xB is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1968 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Scion xB. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2004 Scion xB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 Scion xB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 1968 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 NSU Ro 80 | 2004 Scion xB | |
| Make | NSU | Scion |
| Model | Ro 80 | xB |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2390 cc | 1489 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 45 L |
