1968 Oldsmobile 442 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 7,464 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Oldsmobile 442 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50.
Because 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Oldsmobile 442 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | 442 | V50 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7464 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2720 mm |