1968 Oldsmobile 442 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 7,464 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 822 kg more than 1968 Oldsmobile 442.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Oldsmobile 442 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Cadillac |
Model | 442 | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7464 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 397 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 2507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2947 mm |