1968 Peugeot 204 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1968 Peugeot 204 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Riley Kestrel (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1968 Peugeot 204. (47 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1968 Peugeot 204. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 35 kg more than 1968 Peugeot 204. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Riley Kestrel (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Peugeot 204. (84 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Peugeot 204.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Peugeot 204 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Peugeot | Riley |
Model | 204 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1130 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |