1968 Peugeot 404 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1968 Peugeot 404. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1968 Peugeot 404. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Peugeot 404 weights approximately 187 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Peugeot 404 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Peugeot | Toyota |
| Model | 404 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 4698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |
