1968 Plymouth VIP vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Plymouth VIP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Plymouth VIP would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Plymouth VIP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1968 Plymouth VIP. (230 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1968 Plymouth VIP.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Plymouth VIP. (461 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Plymouth VIP.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Plymouth VIP | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Plymouth | Jaguar |
Model | VIP | XF |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 500 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |