1968 Reliant Regal vs. 1988 Renault 25
To start off, 1988 Renault 25 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Reliant Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Reliant Regal would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault 25 (90 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1968 Reliant Regal. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25 should accelerate faster than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Because 1968 Reliant Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Reliant Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Renault 25 (181 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Reliant Regal. (46 Nm). This means 1988 Renault 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Reliant Regal | 1988 Renault 25 | |
Make | Reliant | Renault |
Model | Regal | 25 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 46 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 60.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 61 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2730 mm |