1968 Reliant Regal vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Reliant Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Reliant Regal would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1968 Reliant Regal. (29 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Reliant Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1498 kg more than 1968 Reliant Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Reliant Regal. (46 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Reliant Regal | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Reliant | Toyota |
Model | Regal | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 46 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 60.4 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 61 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 455 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 87 L |