1968 Reliant Regal vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Reliant Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Reliant Regal would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1968 Reliant Regal. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Because 1968 Reliant Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Reliant Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Reliant Regal. (46 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Reliant Regal | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Reliant | Holden |
Model | Regal | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 46 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2700 mm |