1968 Renault 4 vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Renault 4 | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Renault | SsangYong |
| Model | 4 | Korando |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |
