1968 Renault 4 vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (160 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Camry weights approximately 760 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Renault 4 | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Camry |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |