1968 Renault 4 vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (243 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Renault 4 | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Renault | Subaru |
| Model | 4 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 243 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |
