1968 Renault 4 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 985 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Renault 4 | 2011 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | Renault | Chevrolet |
| Model | 4 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |
