1968 Renault 4 vs. 2012 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Rexton (183 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Renault 4 | 2012 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Renault | SsangYong |
| Model | 4 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 2015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 78 L |
