1968 Renault 6 vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1968 Renault 6. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 835 kg more than 1968 Renault 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1968 Renault 6 has manual transmission. 1968 Renault 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Renault 6 | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Renault | Acura |
Model | 6 | CL |
Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |