1968 Renault 6 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 6 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1968 Renault 6. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Renault 6. (58 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Renault 6.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Renault 6 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | 6 | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 843 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 58 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |