1968 Renault 8 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1968 Renault 8. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 8.
Because 1968 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Renault 8 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 8 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2490 mm |