1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 1963 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1963 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 1963 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Corona |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 75 L |
