1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 1984 Saab 99
To start off, 1984 Saab 99 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 954 kg more than 1984 Saab 99.
Because 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 1984 Saab 99 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Saab |
Model | Silver Shadow | 99 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6229 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1146 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 60 L |