1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2001 Volkswagen New Beetle
To start off, 2001 Volkswagen New Beetle is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 915 kg more than 2001 Volkswagen New Beetle.
Because 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen New Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2001 Volkswagen New Beetle | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Volkswagen |
| Model | Silver Shadow | New Beetle |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 55 L |
