1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 630 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Suzuki |
| Model | Silver Shadow | F1 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 45 L |
