1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2008 Suzuki Forenza
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Forenza is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1225 kg more than 2008 Suzuki Forenza.
Because 2008 Suzuki Forenza is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Forenza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2008 Suzuki Forenza | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Suzuki |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Forenza |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 55 L |
