1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2009 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2009 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 805 kg more than 2009 Suzuki SX4.
Because 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2009 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Suzuki |
| Model | Silver Shadow | SX4 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 50 L |
