1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 250 kg more than 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 100 L |
