1968 Rover 2000 vs. 1984 Toyota Hilux
To start off, 1984 Toyota Hilux is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rover 2000 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1984 Toyota Hilux.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Rover 2000 | 1984 Toyota Hilux | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Hilux |
Year Released | 1968 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2860 mm |