1968 Rover 2000 vs. 2006 Toyota Fortuner
To start off, 2006 Toyota Fortuner is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Fortuner (161 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Rover 2000. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Fortuner should accelerate faster than 1968 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Fortuner weights approximately 26 kg more than 1968 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Fortuner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Fortuner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Fortuner (343 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Rover 2000. (272 Nm). This means 2006 Toyota Fortuner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Rover 2000 | 2006 Toyota Fortuner | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Fortuner |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 272 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2760 mm |