1968 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1968 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 939 kg more than 1968 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Seat 600 | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Seat | Mazda |
Model | 600 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1514 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4442 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2619 mm |