1968 Seat 600 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1968 Seat 600. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 600.
Because 1968 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Seat 600 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Seat | Holden |
Model | 600 | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |