1968 Simca 1000 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1968 Simca 1000. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1968 Simca 1000.
Because 1968 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Simca 1000. (59 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Simca 1000 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Simca | Nissan |
Model | 1000 | Micra |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 59 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |