1968 Skoda 1202 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 340 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1202.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Skoda 1202 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Skoda | Ford |
| Model | 1202 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1174 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 132 L |
