1968 Steyr 700C vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1968 Steyr 700C. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 Steyr 700C.
Because 1968 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Steyr 700C. (42 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Steyr 700C | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Steyr | Holden |
| Model | 700C | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 643 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3190 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2685 mm |
