1968 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1982 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1982 Suzuki Cervo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 538 cc (3 cylinders), 1982 Suzuki Cervo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Suzuki Cervo (26 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki Cervo should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Suzuki Cervo weights approximately 109 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Suzuki Cervo (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Suzuki Cervo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Suzuki Fronte | 1982 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Suzuki | Suzuki |
Model | Fronte | Cervo |
Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 538 cc |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 37 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 426 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 2040 mm |