1968 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo V50 (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V50 weights approximately 639 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo V50 (320 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Suzuki Fronte | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Fronte | V50 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 2519 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |