1968 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 221 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Suzuki Fronte | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Suzuki | Rover |
Model | Fronte | 75 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 4601 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 65 L |