1968 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Suzuki | Holden |
Model | Fronte | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 2492 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |