1968 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2011 Citroen C5
To start off, 2011 Citroen C5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C5 (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C5 weights approximately 864 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C5 (170 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Suzuki Fronte | 2011 Citroen C5 | |
Make | Suzuki | Citroen |
Model | Fronte | C5 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1748 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1624 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 71 L |