1968 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Suzuki Fronte | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Suzuki | Jaguar |
| Model | Fronte | XF |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 785 cc | 2200 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 70 L |
